In the british system cutting speed is expressed in feet per minute and diameter of the work in inches.
Laser cutting speed calculator.
The following are suggested laser cutter configuration settings for various materials.
We ll do this before we run our main project file so that we can optimize for the.
Where d is the diameter of the work in inches and.
For example the ridiculously priced all season 235 55r19 tires are a smidge over 29 inches in diameter so that would mean 3 82 x 1320 sfm 29 2 173 rpm.
The cutting speed direction of feed and depth of cut to be given to a workpiece are shown in the figure below.
In this instructable we will use a test file to find out how the laser works with your material when it is cutting and engraving at different speed and power settings.
The two most common types of laser cutting machines are fiber laser and co 2.
Different fiber optics material quality gases optical lenses cutting patterns etc will affect the cutting speed and need to be adjusted according to site conditions.
Co 2 lasers use an electromagnetically stimulated gas typically a mixture.
In this scenario the precision plasma cutting process has the highest cost of the three processes.
Given its dominance in the sheet metal cutting industry this article focuses on laser fusion cutting.
Laser cutting offers a lower cost for material about 12 ga.
If you d like to learn more about ablative laser cutting check out this article on micron scale manufacturing.
And thinner while the advantage for punch plasma increases as material gets thicker.
Fiber lasers vs co 2.
To determine this you might need to break out the calculator simply multiply the recommended cutting speed by the value 3 82 round up to 4 and then divide by the tool diameter.
Test your material to determine laser speed and power settings.
Also available is a laser cutter user guide.
The final piece of the puzzle for laser processing is the cutting speed.
Laser process calculator the synrad laser processing calculator not only allows you to evaluate the feasibility of laser cutting applications with better predictive algorithms and visual feedback for various material types but it now includes the ability to evaluate simple laser marking applications.
N is the r p m of the work.
Approximately 80 of the time while the program is running the laser is cutting this is the majority of the processing time.
In the heaviest thickness the punch plasma maintains a 40 percent cost advantage over laser cutting.